I've been looking at resampling high resolution orthophoto images (0.10m) using gdalwarp vs gdal_translate to a lower resolution
gdalwarp -co TILED=YES -srcnodata "0 0 0" -dstnodata "0 0 0" -tr 2 2 -r bilinear in.tif warp_2m_bilinear.tif compared to gdal_translate -co TILED=YES -a_nodata 0 -tr 2 2 -r bilinear input.tif translate_2m_bilinear It appears to me that gdal_translate produces a much "better" result with reduced aliasing. Why would the results differ?
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
