On 9 September 2017 at 17:27, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
> On samedi 9 septembre 2017 07:29:23 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote:
>
>> I have a bunch of svn based scripts that I use daily, but I would be
>> happily trash my current work flow for github.
>> I would prefer option 3, but option 2 would be okay too.
>> I think that the utility of github pull requests is just too valuable to go
>> with option 1.
>> I really need to rewatch the classic "Git for Ages 4 and up"...
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ffBJ4sVUb4
>
>
> We'll probably have to do a CONTRIBUTING.md whose one part would give hints
> for the common commands and workflows.

Yes, good idea.

If GDAL moves to GitHub according to the 3rd option, I think this could be
achieved via GitHub Issues and Pull Request templates,
along with the CONTRIBUTING and SUPPORT files.

https://help.github.com/articles/helping-people-contribute-to-your-project/

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to