On 9 September 2017 at 17:27, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote: > On samedi 9 septembre 2017 07:29:23 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote: > >> I have a bunch of svn based scripts that I use daily, but I would be >> happily trash my current work flow for github. >> I would prefer option 3, but option 2 would be okay too. >> I think that the utility of github pull requests is just too valuable to go >> with option 1. >> I really need to rewatch the classic "Git for Ages 4 and up"... >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ffBJ4sVUb4 > > > We'll probably have to do a CONTRIBUTING.md whose one part would give hints > for the common commands and workflows.
Yes, good idea. If GDAL moves to GitHub according to the 3rd option, I think this could be achieved via GitHub Issues and Pull Request templates, along with the CONTRIBUTING and SUPPORT files. https://help.github.com/articles/helping-people-contribute-to-your-project/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev