Hi John, On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:22 AM, John Daniel <etres...@me.com> wrote:
> Hello Jeremy, > I do have a handy patch for this library. I will send it to you in a > private e-mail. It isn’t a small patch so I don’t think I should put it on > the mailing list. > Thanks so much for the patch. For reference I have placed the patch here: https://gist.github.com/palmerj/54fa389c4e60fa7b9f1d5ceea7ac3359 > > I just tested it on High Sierra and it seems to build correctly. I just > built the library. I didn’t try to use it or link it with GDAL. That brings > me to my next question. Why do you want this old thing? It is hard to > build, has questionable licensing, and there are better alternatives > available. If you just need JPEG-2000 support, I would recommend the > OpenJPEG project. > We have a need to read and write ECW files for a few small dev tasks. If it was a read only task then I would use the newer version of the read only ECW libs. I agree that open source JPEG-2000 options are becoming much better, and would rather not touch the ECW format. In time I think we can move to this. Cheers, Jeremy
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev