Hi, I was doing some tests with GeoPackage rasters and found that if I define -a_srs then also -co RASTER_TABLE is required which feels unnecessary. Steps to reproduce:
Create initial gpkg gdal_translate -of GPKG global_mosaic_0.png raster.gpkg -a_srs epsg:4326 Try to add a subdataset and assign srs for that too gdal_translate -of GPKG global_mosaic_1.png raster.gpkg -a_srs epsg:4326 -co APPEND_SUBDATASET=YES 0ERROR 1: RASTER_TABLE must be set to a non empty value Append subdataset without -a_srs succeeds even if I do not give the name for the raster table. I know that the corner coordinates which are reported from the whole GeoPackage which contains several subdatasets are meaningless, but I still wonder why it reports just range 0-512 which does not fit with any of my raster tables nor with the pixel space used by the tiles. Is it a hardcoded value? gdalinfo raster.gpkg ... Size is 512, 512 Coordinate System is `' Subdatasets: SUBDATASET_1_NAME=GPKG:raster.gpkg:raster SUBDATASET_1_DESC=raster - raster SUBDATASET_2_NAME=GPKG:raster.gpkg:global_mosaic_1 SUBDATASET_2_DESC=global_mosaic_1 - global_mosaic_1 Corner Coordinates: Upper Left ( 0.0, 0.0) Lower Left ( 0.0, 512.0) Upper Right ( 512.0, 0.0) Lower Right ( 512.0, 512.0) Center ( 256.0, 256.0) -Jukka Rahkonen-
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
