Here is the gdalinfo output I am just re-projecting to 4326 Driver: VRT/Virtual Raster Files: Depth (Max).vrt Depth (Max).Terrainredacted.tif Depth (Max). redacted .tif Size is 309153, 277451 Coordinate System is: PROJCS["USA_Contiguous_Albers_Equal_Area_Conic_USGS_version", GEOGCS["NAD83", DATUM["North_American_Datum_1983", SPHEROID["GRS 1980",6378137,298.2572221010042, AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]], AUTHORITY["EPSG","6269"]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0], UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433], AUTHORITY["EPSG","4269"]], PROJECTION["Albers_Conic_Equal_Area"], PARAMETER["standard_parallel_1",29.5], PARAMETER["standard_parallel_2",45.5], PARAMETER["latitude_of_center",23], PARAMETER["longitude_of_center",-96], PARAMETER["false_easting",0], PARAMETER["false_northing",0], UNIT["US survey foot",0.3048006096012192, AUTHORITY["EPSG","9003"]]] Origin = (2771031.965285023674369,6437561.791629494167864) Pixel Size = (3.000000000000000,-3.000000000000000) Corner Coordinates: Upper Left ( 2771031.965, 6437561.792) ( 85d57'44.50"W, 40d16'21.58"N) Lower Left ( 2771031.965, 5605208.792) ( 86d16'11.82"W, 38d 1'16.13"N) Upper Right ( 3698490.965, 6437561.792) ( 82d38'29.14"W, 39d57'46.13"N) Lower Right ( 3698490.965, 5605208.792) ( 83d 2'54.73"W, 37d43'14.99"N) Center ( 3234761.465, 6021385.292) ( 84d28'47.64"W, 39d 0'18.59"N) Band 1 Block=128x128 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Gray Min=0.001 Max=96.054 Minimum=0.001, Maximum=96.054, Mean=6.209, StdDev=10.756 NoData Value=-9999 Metadata: STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=96.0537109375 STATISTICS_MEAN=6.2090953579112 STATISTICS_MINIMUM=0.0009765625 STATISTICS_STDDEV=10.756049212573
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:53 AM Michael Sumner <mdsum...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the source (and target) projection and extent? Some projections > have expansive limits, but you can specify the target extent with -te > > HTH > > On Fri., 13 Mar. 2020, 23:43 Brian, <mulcahy.bri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it faster to do a gdal_warp with compression then without? Is it safe >> to assume the drive write speed would be the limiting factor for speed in >> this case? >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:33 AM Cainã K. Campos < >> rupestre.cam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello Brian, >>> >>> Try to add the switch -co "COMPRESS=LZW" to the command line to >>> generate a compressed result with lossless compression. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:07 AM Brian <mulcahy.bri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> So compressed this raster is fairly small about 120mb but running >>>> gdal_warp produces a raster that is about 416 gb, is this something this >>>> list can help with? If so I can upload the file somewhere and let you >>>> guys/gals take a look at it. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gdal-dev mailing list >>>> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev