On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:38 PM Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote:
> The only question that matters here is "Who is going to maintain it?" and > if the answer to that is "no one", it should be removed. There doesn't need > to be any meetings because the only criteria that matters is if someone is > willing to maintain it. We should provide the list of drivers and assign > the GitHub handles that step forward to be responsible for each. If obscure > government one-offs formats have an audience of downtrodden government > users forced to use them, they need to put their handle in and take > ownership. They then need to find the time, money, or attention to carry > things forward. > Howard / Even, I'd be willing to commit to maintaining some of the archaic drivers that meet the conditions I mentioned (buildable, testable in core build). If Even would like I can provide a sublist of those he proposed i'd be willing to be responsible for. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | +1 650-701-7823 and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev