Done. Even there should be no need to report the results again (all tests were OK) I would recommend to try the TEAM Engine just for fun. It was a pleasant experience for me.
-Jukka Rahkonen- Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > if anyone cares about GDAL still being mentionned as a OGC KML reference > implementation, run autotest/kml_generate_test_files.py with GDAL 3.2, > submit > the produced 4 files to the OGC KML 2.2 test harness > (https://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine/viewSessions.jsp) > and communicate to Angelos (CC'ed) your CITE user account and the session > numbers. > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@.osgeo > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
