I note that NITF JPEG is a bit different to what libjpeg puts out by default. See MIL-STD-188-198A.

I would interested to see sample data with C5/M5 IC. What makes it?

Brad

On 17 Jun. 2021 04:07, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:


Le 16/06/2021 à 19:53, GeodudeKid a écrit :
> We can refer to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_JPEG. "Besides
> lossless compression, JPEG-LS also provides a lossy mode ("near-lossless")
> where the maximum absolute error can be controlled by the encoder." That
> being said, would the existing JPEGLS driver be able to support lossless and
> lossy input imagery?

Its capabilities should match the ones of
https://github.com/team-charls/charls :

"This project's goal is to provide a full implementation of the ISO/IEC
14495-1:1999, "Lossless and near-lossless compression of continuous-tone
still images: Baseline" standard."

But I'm not aware of Lossless JPEG (not sure which variant NITF refers
to, if it is the " 1993 addition to JPEG standard " or JPEG-LS
ISO-14495-1/ITU-T.87) being actually used in practice with NITF (at
least I've never seen such beast). People generally use either good-old
JPEG or JPEG-2000 if they want compression.

Even

--

http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to