+1 to match Howard's sentiment. Unless someone steps up with a strong use case for why to keep it, I think it should go.
I am curious if any of the alpine images are getting lots of use outside of GDAL's CI testing. On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:20 AM Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: > > > > On Aug 25, 2021, at 12:34 PM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm considering retiring the osgeo/gdal:alpine-ultra-small Docker image. > It's size difference with the osgeo/gdal:alpine-small one is small (50 MB > vs 59 MB), and with arm64 images being now generated, the cross-compilation > time for it becomes a bit painful. Any opposition to that? > > +1 for simpler and faster infrastructure > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
