I am not sure if I should be posting this here or on the bug - so I am starting here.
The RFC does not mention (either positively or negatively) the SWIG bindings. Just for the avoidance of doubt : - It should probably be made clear in the doc if the SWIG bindings are to be included in the CMAKE build process, and - I ask the question, in all innocence and without any prejudice on my behalf or even idea of what the answer would be, since if there were to be a better way of organising things then a major refactor of the build process would be the correct time to implement it. Paul On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 12:49, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/4590 a RFC that > proposes: > > - to develop a CMake build system, officially integrated in the source > tree. > > - and remove the current GNU makefiles and nmake build systems, when the > CMake build system has matured enough and reached feature parity. > > Best regards, > > Een > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev