sounds good, +1 thanks, TB
Le lun. 6 janv. 2025, 18:44, Even Rouault via gdal-dev < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > Given that communication with Adobe in recent years has been similar to > expecting to receive a signal from a black hole from outside its event > horizon, up to now we have unilaterally attributed Compression=50002 to > mean JPEGXL in TIFF. Recently I saw that the DNG 1.7 specification has > registered value 52546 to mean JPEGXL in DNG > ( > https://helpx.adobe.com/content/dam/help/en/photoshop/pdf/DNG_Spec_1_7_0_0.pdf > , page 122). DNG is a derivative of the TIFF spec, so I guess/hope Adobe > makes sure that tag & tag value numbers don't collide between base TIFF > and DNG. So it would seem to me that switching to using the 52546 value > would be more future proof than our self-assigned 50002. If so, I'd do > the change in master to using 52546 on write side and accepting both > 50002 and 52546 on read side, and backport read support for 52546 in 3.10 > > (this is mostly a GDAL-only topic for now given that the JPEGXL TIFF > codec is for the internal libtiff copy only) > > Thoughts? > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, > this is just about bytes. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
