2009/7/14 Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> > Lex Trotman schrieb: > > > Well, I haven't evens started to integrate that field, so it's a bit > early to assume how it would behave. > > > > I pretty much planned that it would fill the appropriate defaults if > they're empty. And very few special characters which for example expand to > the file's path (i.e. more than just %e and %f). That would make it pretty > easy. > > > > > > Sorry Frank, you've sort of lost me here? :-S > > > > Cheers > > Lex > > What didn't you understand? > > I basically just argued against your arguments, that it will be more work > to put the paths in, by filling the entry boxes with nice default values > (such as the project's or file's path), plus by adding a few variables to > expand to suitable paths (like %e already does for the current file, %p > could expand to the path of the current file). > > That's all to free the user of tight limitations of Geany (w.r.t to > building) and to support even unconventional build system, which I know a > few of.
Which is why I am doing this whole damn thing.;-) > > > Best regards. > Ok, now I get you, good idea. I have top posted a cleaned up version of my description so lets see what feedback there is. New version is in SVN, if you can update your patch I won't make any changes tonight and try your patch tomorrow. Cheers Lex > > _______________________________________________ > Geany-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel >
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
