On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:47:30 -0500, Brad wrote:

> On 06/06/2010 12:33 PM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> >
> >> The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug
> >> issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is
> >> really a
> >
> > Which patch exactly?
> 
> The filename is "40_gio_file_saving.dpatch".  I attached it to this 
> e-mail for easy reference.

Thanks.


> >> I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue"
> >> thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and
> >> it covered a few other topics.
> >
> > Well, I think for the medium-term, we should use GIO completely for
> > file IO. But this would mean we would need to adjust a lot of code
> > (in Geany), we would need to find a solution for the tagmanager
> > (which does low-level file IO on the files) and probably change the
> > plugin API. And last but not least, we would need to bump to GTK
> > version requirement from 2.8 to 2.12, better 2.14.
> 
> I, of course, like this solution the a lot, and it seems like the
> most robust to me, as GIO (as far as I understand) is meant to be
> GLib's file interface.  But I should qualify that I don't actively

It is.


> > So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
> >
> > As said in another mail, the planned release is delayed a bit, so we
> > could fix this in time, probably.
> 
> That would be really fantastic.

Didn't work, real-life sucks :).


Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel

Reply via email to