On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
Enrico Tröger <enrico.troe...@uvena.de> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>Enrico Tröger <enrico.troe...@uvena.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>>
>> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
>> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
>> >> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troe...@uvena.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the
>> >>> combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of
the
>> >>> geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just
cause
>> >>> confusion, IMO.
>> >>
>> >> So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by
0.20,
>> >> and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
>>
>> 0.20.
>> I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside
is a
>> good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this
actually
>> matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
>
>Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the
geany-plugins
repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this
could
be removed?
It is. Just check http://git.geany.org/geany-plugins/tree/
Then it seems the GIT mirror is broken.
See http://geany-plugins.svn.sf.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/trunk, and for
some reason,
I think the SVN repo is more important than the GIT mirror :).
Regards,
Enrico
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
