On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:10:36 +1100 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dimitar Zhekov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > weltall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> So now the idea of having the new file open in a new session if geany > >> was not opened is not wanted anymore? > > > > I can live without it. But my view is biased, since I use Geany with x11 > > session management, so the main instances are pretty much permanent. > > I'd have thought that you would be even *more* upset that the > filemanager shoves extra files into your "permanent" sessions :-) No. With session management, you can open the projects in secondary instances, and let the primary instances catch the double-clicking and command line. The secondary instances retain their status after restart, even if the primary instance does not exist any more (thanks, Eugene). Maybe I shoudn't have used the word "main" instances for the ones that I mainly use... :) To clarify, they are both primary, on desktops used exclusively for a single project, and secondary. > In other words --in-new-session is independent of session management > and is about temporarily interrupting the session without modifying > it. [...] the pseudocode modification below doesn't save the session > on in-new-session IMO, --new-instance should not save the session, since it never loads it; combined with xsm, that's plenty of "temporarily interrupting the session without modifying it" to make in-new-session unneeded for me. > PS the pseudocode modification below doesn't save the session on > in-new-session Indeed. Yet you can make your own modification easier than tweaking the existing startup, not to speak about the 2nd weltall patch. -- E-gards: Jimmy _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
