On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:47:22 +0100% Frank Lanitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:06:26 +1100 > Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 31 January 2011 02:54, Frank Lanitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:31:21 +0300 > > > Eugene Arshinov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> [snip] > > >> > > >> It is harder to find the discussion than the patches themselves, > > >> but here is a couple of links: > > >> > > >> <http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2009-November/001577.html> > > >> (X session management support) > > >> <http://lists.uvena.de/geany-devel/2010-January/001655.html> > > >> (Questions about Geany project support) > > >> > > >> I don't object against your patches, but I'm just pointing to > > >> existing discussion which may be useful. I must note that there > > >> are no plans about including those patches from 'sm' branch in > > >> trunk (because nobody would want/have time to do it, and it won't > > >> be quite easy as 'sm' branch has become rather diverse from > > >> trunk), so your way is free :) > > > > > > Well, not sure whether I'm right the branch wasn't ready for > > > including to trunk and nobody did care about later on. Please > > > correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > > > I guess now (post 0.20) is the time to do major additions, if a > > current trunk is merged with sm branch and it still works then maybe > > its time. > > I guess this is something the original author of the branch needs to > do. > > Cheers, > Frank Certainly. I've already merged trunk in my local Git repository, but I haven't yet find some time to carefully test the branch again. Though, I use this merged version at home every day and experience no problems, so most things should be fine. Tomorrow I'll update the SVN sm branch. Best regards, Eugene. _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
