On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:27:24 +0100, Colomban wrote: >On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:32:48 +1100, Lex wrote: >>>>> We could maybe add a little wrapper script into the scripts/ >>>>> directory which sets a bunch of compiler options we like, for >>>>> convenience. >>>> >>>> Having scripts like these is non-standard so it would have to be >>>> *well* documented. I still personally prefer in the build so long >>>> as >>> >>> Ok. But if it's in the build system, it should be optionally and >>> disabled by default, at least. >> >> Ok by me. (So long as how to enable it is obvious somewhere, unlike >> most other configure options, I'm still not sure how to generate >> plugins for non-standard prefixes using autofools :-) > >Why not, easy enough. However, I'm not completely sure the info in >HACKING or whatever would be visible enough for every new (and current! >) developer to see it, but we might start this way and see if it is OK.
I agree it might get forgotten in HACKING... >Something like ./configure --enable-extra-c-warnings (or shorter if you >prefer ^^) ...so this sounds good to me. Maybe that option could also display a hint to check HACKING for more information about flags. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpMSMZZOjK9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel