On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:52:24 +0100, Thomas wrote: >On 13.03.2011 14:50, Enrico Tröger wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:39:29 +0100, Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 13.03.2011 14:35, Enrico Tröger wrote: >>>>>> Something like ./configure --enable-extra-c-warnings (or shorter >>>>>> if you prefer ^^) >>>> ...so this sounds good to me. Maybe that option could also display >>>> a hint to check HACKING for more information about flags. >>> >>> Why disabled by default? I don't quite understand that. Disabled by >>> default defeats the whole purpose. >> Portability. >> > >I thought the warnings are only enabled if the compiler understands >them anyway (so portability is not an issue)? That's what the initial >mail about the warnings said.
As I said, I didn't read all of the thread, shame on me. Still, not sure whether it can be reliably checked whether the compiler supports all the options and/or whether it's worth checking this. Though, if you all want this, I won't hinder you. At least not for G-P. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpp4EDtWLmlG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel