On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000 Lex Trotman <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] > > Due the huge number of contributors at the plugins project and the, > > well quiet often broken build, a more decentralized process would be > > good for the plugins. We talked about this a couple of days ago > > inside IRC and we came to that point, that it would be might useful > > to make more usage of branches and only merge to trunk, when its > > apply correct and build is not broken and some other points of > > policy is met - Well I'm imagine a bit the Linux Kernel development > > model even of course the plugins are not that big - not yet ;) > > Only a minor change to your new name, Frank Linus? > > > This could be done on svn its a bit a more complicated so maybe a > > git (or brz, hg) would be useful here. But this is something for > > post-21-plugins release. > > Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the Geany > project only needs to manage the aggregated build. Yes, this was the outcome on IRC. So once a feature is ready/bug has been fixed a pull request is send to maintainer who is including them into his/her tree. Once this has been done a snapshot of that tree will be the release. > The rule would be > like the Linux one, don't break Franks tree :-) ;) Yepp. > Looks like the policy needs include 64 bit test builds (at least until > the int/pointer errors go away). I agree. I'd like to have also some tests on PPC and IA64. At least a PPC (G4 or G5 Mac) I have here (only I need is somebody who is able to set it up....) Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpwaCHIsCmtS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel