On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Stuart Brorson wrote: > Peter -- > > I see you've been using some kind of documentation pragma in your > patches. Here's an example: > > /*! \brief Register some libgeda variables with scheme. > * \par Function Description > * Define some variables to be visible to Scheme. > */
That is Carlos's I believe. > I was just wondering what your documentation extraction program was? > > This doesn't look like DOxygen style pragma, and I am not an expert on > other documentation generators. Any documentation in the noscreen branch has mostly been copy-pasted from the existing code, as it was quite a "gentle" refactor - I've no idea if that markup is correct, but it at least ought to be similar to how it was before. Peter _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
