El vie, 06-04-2007 a las 18:44 +0100, Peter Clifton escribió: > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Stuart Brorson wrote: > > Peter -- > > > > I see you've been using some kind of documentation pragma in your > > patches. Here's an example: > > > > /*! \brief Register some libgeda variables with scheme. > > * \par Function Description > > * Define some variables to be visible to Scheme. > > */ > > That is Carlos's I believe.
Yes, that was me. I just followed the existing documentation convention. Doxygen allows you to use several formats: http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html And that format was the one used since the noweb transition: http://www.geda.seul.org/mailinglist/geda-dev84/msg00082.html The documentation is generated executing: - make doxygen in libgeda/docs - make doxygen in gschem/docs Regards, Carlos _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
