> Category: win32 port > Group: CVS > Status: Open > Resolution: None > Priority: 5 > Private: No > Submitted By: Cesar Strauss (cstrauss) > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Summary: Fix for lack of permission-related file attributes on MinGW > > Initial Comment: > On the MinGW platform, files can only be read-write or read-only. It lacks > concepts like the executable-bit, user-id, group-id and the distinction > between "user", "group" and "other" permissions flags. > > The solution was to define the missing flags as zero, and comment out the > code which depend on the availability of chown. > > In my opinion, the resulting behavior is correct from the point of view of a > Windows user, in the sense that the backup files are still being marked as > read-only. > > Regards, > Cesar
I think we ought to compare notes on the fixes needed for MinGW, no point in duplicating work. (OTOH, many of my "fixes" were quick hacks to make it compile). My (hacks) are at http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/fix_win32.diff Many of the fixes probably ought to be "feature" based #ifdef rather than #ifdef WIN32, but they give the general impression of what needs doing to make a working gschem. There may even be some bits which ought to get included in mainstream geda, such as the wrong guile header file which is used in at least one place. Regards, Peter > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=818428&aid=1733728&group_id=161080 > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-bug mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-bug -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
