Peter Clifton wrote: > > I think we ought to compare notes on the fixes needed for MinGW, no > point in duplicating work. (OTOH, many of my "fixes" were quick hacks to > make it compile). > > My (hacks) are at http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/fix_win32.diff >
Sure, likewise. I placed mine at: http://www.savefile.com/projects/808499535 I examined you patch, you seem to have gone farther on some areas. I remained basically on the core (libgeda/gschem/gattrib). I will merge some of your changes, thanks. > Many of the fixes probably ought to be "feature" based #ifdef rather > than #ifdef WIN32, but they give the general impression of what needs > doing to make a working gschem. I am in the process of splitting my monolithic patch into several topical patches, introducing feature tests and replacing missing features with glib functions where possible. Regards, Cesar _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
