On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Tim Freedom wrote: > Fair enough, I'm not a windows user - I just wanted to point out the various > tidbits of info out there regarding GTKWave and how confusing it might look > to someone looking for an opensource alternative.
Yeah, I agree that it's a bit confusing...a fork, downporting of 2.x features to 1.3 when 2.x was orphaned, 1.3 really being the "latest", etc. > If 2.0.x and 1.3.x have no chance of converging, could we ask them to release > the name so as to lessen the confusion. In other words, can we ask the ATP > project to rename their version of the code to say GTKasyncWave or something > similar... Eventually bumping 1.3.x up to 3.x might be the cleanest way of doing it as anyone looking at version numbers of existing tarballs is going to get confused. I'll update the screenshots on rr.com sometime soon. Those shots might be from all the way back in 2000. (Really.) > BTW: I saw no info/pages or references on OpenSKIL http://sourceforge.net/projects/openstil ...whoops, I got my acronyms mixed up! -Tony
