[snip] >Ales, could you please update the GTKWave page with all this info and see >what can be done about getting a clean separation between the ATP version >of GTKWave (name change ?) and the actively developed GTKWave (as noted by >Tony) ?
Yes, I will take care of this.
What if I drop all major mention of the 2.0.x version? Would this
be acceptable? Maybe just a historical link?
-Ales
