> It would be less confusing to have a layer name list as in your > drawing, with per layer option to mirror or not. Then also, if you > were still in the mood for GUI coding, offer use cases as check > boxes that modify the state of the per layer check boxes, (while > also showing that state). And just drop the wording auto-mirror > altogether. It's more like assume-o-matic than automatic...
I think it would get too messy to put all the options in a layer-specific grid. However, we could do something like Eagle where we have a CAM job that specifies, in excrutiating detail, what the output would be. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user