Found the answer to my own question by playing around a bit. The pins on the top level symbol didn't have a pinnumber attribute - I didn't think I needed them since they are meaningless. When I put them in, the problem goes away. I've made them invisible so as not to give meaningless info on the top level schematic.
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 10:06 +0100, Peter Baxendale wrote: > OK, thanks for the response. Attached is a very simple hierarchical > design. The .pcb and .net files were generated by "gsch2pcb --skip-m4". > You can see the U?-? in the .net file. > > On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 07:11 -0400, John Luciani wrote: > > On 7/18/07, Peter Baxendale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know where the U?-? comes from. It's not in any of the > > > schematics, just in the netlist produced by gsch2pcb. Every net that > > > connects to one of the io symbols ends in a U?-?. The line I quoted > > > should only have 3 nodes, the extra U?-? looks to be entirely spurious. > > > I should have said, I'm using the gschem 1.0.1-20070626 release. > > > > You may want to post a simple schematic that demonstrates the problem. > > > > (* jcl *) > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Baxendale University of Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED] School of Engineering tel +44 191 33 42492 South Road fax +44 191 33 42408 Durham DH1 3LE England ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user