I suggest just adding a statement in the documentation and perhaps in gsch2pcb that using the m4 (or other low resolution) libraries is deprectated and not recomended for new designs.
Steve Meier On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 19:10 +0200, Wojciech Kazubski wrote: > I propose to split old (m4) libraries into separate package. Then noone would > be forced to have them and anyone will use only those libraries he > wants/needs (maybe better ones?). > > Wojciech Kazubski > > > Here, we never ever use them. > > > > Dumping the low resolution land patterns would encourage replacement. > > > > Steve Meier > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 11:03 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > My suggestion would be to just dump the old libraries. Why build new > > > > boards with obsolete land patterns. > > > > > > Because that particular library is ~geda, the one with all the really > > > useful common footprints in it. > > > > > > What we need to do is replace them, not just dump them. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > geda-user mailing list > > > geda-user@moria.seul.org > > > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geda-user mailing list > > geda-user@moria.seul.org > > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user