On Thursday 09 August 2007 21:16, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: > On 8/9/07, David Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The story seems to be that they're all getting out because OLEDs don't > > last much longer than a year or two. Consider instead something like > > How is this possible, when OLEDs have been shown to last longer than > incadescent lightbulbs (which certainly last longer than one to two > years these days)? Something sounds awfully fishy to me. > > Personally, I think it's just a matter of economy of scale. LCDs are > probably quite a bit cheaper to produce, and technology these days > rivals the contrast ratios of OLEDs. > > Therefore, there'd be no economic incentive to persue OLEDs.
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201201713 That link says Osram is getting out of the OLED display business so that they can pursue the OLED Light business. 100W OLED Light Bulb anyone? [Not that you'd want that, being more efficient they would take less than 100W for far more light.] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
