On 8/9/07, David Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The story seems to be that they're all getting out because OLEDs don't > last much longer than a year or two. Consider instead something like
How is this possible, when OLEDs have been shown to last longer than incadescent lightbulbs (which certainly last longer than one to two years these days)? Something sounds awfully fishy to me. Personally, I think it's just a matter of economy of scale. LCDs are probably quite a bit cheaper to produce, and technology these days rivals the contrast ratios of OLEDs. Therefore, there'd be no economic incentive to persue OLEDs. -- Samuel A. Falvo II _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
