On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Duncan Drennan wrote: >> Schematic DRC checking is badly broken unless you are a real gEDA >> wizard, and nearly useless unless you are doing pure digital design. >> I don't understand why the gnetlist spew nags users to employ it. > > What exactly is "badly broken"? I've picked up errors and no connects > by running DRCs, which is quite useful.
No connects aren't errors: real circuits have lots of them. > There are one or two things > that I don't understand why it moans (like errors on input/output > connected to input or output pins). And I can't find the real errors through the fog of non-errors. Its whole model of input, output, power, etc. is really only applicable if you're using a single digital technology and nothing else. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user