On 9/15/07, Carlos Nieves Ónega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 13-09-2007 a las 16:36 -0400, John Luciani escribió: > [snip] > > If you fill the screen (or logfile) with false-positves it can make it > > very difficult > > to find the few true-positives (especially for newbies). Without > > detailed and accurate documentation it is very hard to tweak the tool > > to get useful information from it > > (especially for newbies that can't find the documentation ;-) > > Fully agree. Do you (or anyone) have any cases of false positives at > hand?
My comment was general not specific to gschem. I have not tried the gschem DRC checker. The only schematic DRC check I have found useful is a rule that identifies unconnected pins that aren't marked unconnected. I work on a number of schematics in parallel and get frequent interruptions. Marking pins as unconnected has saved me a few blue wires. (* jcl *) -- http://www.luciani.org _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user