Dave N6NZ wrote: maybe simply > looking at the gerber aperture and stroke information and grouping pads > by identical shape and identical spacing is a good first footprint > grouping.
The silk needs to be considered to get useful groups. I'm no AI coder, and don't plan on learning to do that for this task. Even rasterizing footprint at a time to do a fuzzy comparisons seems like a lot of coding for the value... John G -- Ecosensory Austin TX _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user