Dan McMahill wrote: > Stephen Williams wrote: >> Does anybody have access to a Verilog-AMS tool and can said person >> attempt to run the attached sample program? It is a very simple >> program, but it is an attempt to test some of my understanding of >> very basic principles of Verilog-AMS. >> >> I understand that Verilog-AMS tools are very few and very far between, >> but I would like to work on that problem. This example, though trivial >> in the extreme, covers a fair amount. > > I think you want to declare your signals that you have listed as > 'voltage' as 'electrical'. Thats assuming verilog-ams doesn't do things > differently from verilog-a which I'm more familiar with.
I think it'll come out the same for me (given that the program is only using the "potential" nature) but OK change it to "electrical". I still wonder if it will run as I expect. -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user