On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:09:01 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> The most obvious obstacle in the migration path is the lack of >> conversion >> tools. > > With the exception of the flow from gschem to layout in another suite, > which works radically well.
This is not conversion, but a work flow partially in geda, partially in some other suite. As nice as it is, it does not make the switch to and from geda any easier. The missing feature is the ability to import and export symbols, schematics, footprints and layouts to and from other suites. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user