On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:18:39 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > We could "probably" do with some additional annotations "somewhere" > about exactly what pieces constitute a physical device - or sub-circuit, > but that that would be an addition - rather than the abuse of an > existing interface.
The two other EDA suites I worked (eagle and protel) with maintain the notion of a "component" that contains all the info. In a way, this is a very heavy symbol that knows about slots, possible footprints and which schematic symbols are necessary to represent a complete component. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
