There are a lot of ideas going around here and most of them sound like good features. I'm a long time but casual user of geda and I don't want to step on the toes of those who use it more or actively develop the tools. I'd just like like to interject one thing.
I think it's important to pay attention to what is already in geda. For me, a very large issue is the coherency of the symbol and footprint libraries. It sounds like many of the changes being discussed would eliminate the need for much of the confusion in those libraries presently. I think though it's important to acknowledge that if the changes here are implemented, there is much work that is less exciting to be done before everyone can stop resorting to personal libraries of redudnant symbols and footprints. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user