Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 19:20 +0000, Gareth Edwards wrote:
If we want to trial this model, I'm personally happy to become one of
the "second-class developers" as Kai-Martin put it - to do some patch
triage for gEDA tools in general, not just pcb.
Sure!
These things typically evolve anyway.. and are not assigned. I guess
what we're saying is that someone taking an interest in patches,
verifying them, and perhaps championing them to the developers - would
be a useful... if that inspires people to fill that role, excellent, but
I don't expect we'll be formally assigning "second-class-developers".
In a much much larger project that I've been involved with for a long
time, new developers need 2 sponsors who will review and approve commits
for a little while. There has been talk from time to time about the
notion of "second-class-developers" ~forever over there but in the end,
most of us have enough sense to not mess with parts that are too far
outside of our expertise. Thats why I've filed a good number of bug
reports, sometime with patches attached even, for a project that I've
had commit access to for well over a decade.
Perhaps we can even form some teams interested to receive email updates,
and get subscribed to bugs / patches in certain areas, with patches for
review, or whatever.
fwiw, there is a pcb-bugs mailing list with only me as the subscriber.
Of course in all fairness, that list didn't exist yesterday ;) That
list will get all new bug reports and updates to existing reports.
-Dan
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user