On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, timecop wrote: > You said you wanted a "100% open source tool chain" and gave FPGA as example. > So, please name a vendor who provides such hardware/software (for FPGA > design) which would satisfy this license requirement of being "100% > open".
I don't believe there is one. Yet, a license that says only that you must publish design data in publicly documented file format would allow such a design. That is my point. > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dave N6NZ <n...@arrl.net> wrote: >> >> On Jul 14, 2010, at 9:47 PM, timecop wrote: >> >>>> Example: FPGA's. Verilog source isn't going to help if the FPGA fitter >>>> tool proprietary >>> >>> OK. >>> Please name a vendor for FPGA hardware + toolchain that fits into this >>> absolutely ridiculous requirement. >> >> I don't understand your question. Can you clarify? >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geda-user mailing list >>> geda-user@moria.seul.org >>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geda-user mailing list >> geda-user@moria.seul.org >> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
