No, I'm just using whatever tool gets the job done while staying out of the way. I don't actually use Protel, but I did purchase the EDA suite that I'm using.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Armin Faltl <armin.fa...@aon.at> wrote: > Man, what are you doing here? > Read up and steal ideas to incorporate in proprietary tools? > Try snatch bits of wisdome to patent denying prior art? > > timecop wrote: >>> >>> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual >>> *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive. I'd >>> like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement >>> is that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need >>> to be in open, documented formats. >>> >> >> Keep dreaming, bro. >> Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geda-user mailing list >> geda-user@moria.seul.org >> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
