On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 00:18 +0200, Levente Kovacs wrote: > On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:24:38 +0000 > Ineiev <ine...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Probably this patch may be used as a workaround. > > Why don't we just push this patch to HEAD? This works just great.
One minor nit.. I'd keep the "non-copper" / "skip-drc" ideas separate. We might (at some point) have DRC rules for non-copper layers (not that I can think of them at the moment, perhaps apart from silk layer(s)). Otherwise, seems good. Best regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user