On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 09:30 +0200, Kovacs Levente wrote: > On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:19:08 +0100 > Peter Clifton <pc...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > > I'd keep the "non-copper" / "skip-drc" ideas separate. We might (at > > some point) have DRC rules for non-copper layers (not that I can > > think of them at the moment, perhaps apart from silk layer(s)). > > Component outline vs. keep-in component layer, etc. > > However at this point where we are now, this patch would be great help.
My point was that the patch muddles the "non-copper" / "skip-drc" concepts, and this should be fixed before the patch is applied. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user