On Sep 8, 2010, at 7:47 AM, David C. Kerber wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org >> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of John Doty >> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:07 PM >> To: gEDA user mailing list >> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0 >> >> >> On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:50 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> >>> But any design that requires you to edit files behind pcb's >> back, is bad. >> >> You're not thinking "flexible toolkit". You're thinking >> "inflexible integrated tool". > > He said "requires", not "allows". Big difference.
Yes, but if you read the previous message, DJ assumed that "allows" meant "requires". It's what Gell-Mann called the "Totalitarian Principle" (Everything not forbidden is compulsory). That is, of course, opposed to the flexible toolkit approach. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user