The only other way I can think of (that doesn't introduce dependencies)
involves a collection of Batch files, none of which are particularly
nice....
Given that .NET gets installed as a Windows Update..... I figured it was
probably safe. Especially given since the app only requires version
2.0, which is supported on 98SE.
The problem is dealing with the "portable" root that way. Couldn't find
an obvious way to get the directory of the *current* file. Not the
working directory, the directory of the current file. Windows has the
joys of shortcuts having a tendancy to start in C:\Windows..... or
somewhere other than the "Start In:" field.
Anyway, I'd say this enough of the "Why .NET?" argument. What've I
broken in building it this way? Do let me know.
Cheers,
Chris
On 19/09/2010 18:44, John Griessen wrote:
On 09/19/2010 12:12 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
Anyone USING .net in 2010 is asking to be ridiculed.
Are there other ways than .NET to "help out" a build on windows?
(I don't see messages from timecop, since he's in my kill file)
What's the status of Carlos Nieve's build method?
John
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user