> >> I think this is consistent with gschem; a symbol in your schematic > >> specifies the footprint it needs when it becomes an element on your > >> board. > > No. A symbol in gschem is not necessarily "elementary".
I meant consistent with gschem's use of the terms "footprint" and "element". _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user