> >> I think this is consistent with gschem; a symbol in your schematic
> >> specifies the footprint it needs when it becomes an element on your
> >> board.
> 
> No. A symbol in gschem is not necessarily "elementary".

I meant consistent with gschem's use of the terms "footprint" and
"element".


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Reply via email to