On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 11:26 +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote: > Hi Peter, > Here's my patch that should be equivalent to your patches 0001 > followed by 0002. > My patch is against GIT head as at commit > 466b0183758ef3ca44623c43de60a233b175d2ad Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:43:19 > +0000 (13:43 +0000) > I suggest you check that our patches are equivalent, hopefully that > will ensure that no mistakes slip through.
It caught a few things I'd changed where I shouldn't have, and although we didn't end up with completely identical changes, I've fixed up my patches and pushed them. Speaking of which.. I really meant to get your name on the commit log, and I did not. VERY sorry about that, especially after all the help you've given me with testing things. AH HECK.. I'm going to break a rule and non-fast-forward push them again with the appropriate credit. Best wishes, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user