On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:09:45 +0100 Kai-Martin Knaak <kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
> > If footprints are extended to allow text elements to be included, then > > I really hope that general polygons will be allowed too. > > plus arcs, two layers of silk, lines in copper, vias, mid layers, ... > In short: The footprint format should allow everything you can do in a > layout. I see no point in arbitrary restrictions. That was mainly what I was wondering about in the first place. Shouldn't footprints be something like functions in programming? Or maybe slightly more similar to macros? John _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user