John Coppens wrote: > I see no point in arbitrary restrictions. > > That was mainly what I was wondering about in the first place. > Shouldn't footprints be something like functions in programming? Or > maybe slightly more similar to macros?
There is one caveat, though: Layouts can contain layers with arbitrary names and vastly different layer groups. Footprints should not be tied to a specific layer stack. Layers in the footprint have to be mapped according to the principle of least surprise. ---<)kaimartin(>-- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user