On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 09:23:17PM -0500, Mark wrote: <snip>
> So, because I use several methods, a single one-size-fits-all library is just > not going to work for me. > I *could* make use of a library of heavy symbols but I still need the > lightweight symbols, too. If I > was forced to choose one library then I would like to keep the lightweight > stuff. > Maybe we should extend existing library in a way that we clone existing symbols, prefix the names by use case and add/delete attributes. Since the currently available library wouldn't change at all, no existing schematics would be broken. We now have resistor-1.sym and resistor-2.sym; we woulg then have these cloned as _P_resistor-1.sym and _P_resistor-2.sym, _P_ meaning they are intended for use on PCB. Of course, this would increase the confusion of new users, but it should be no harder than getting the L/N/M suffix of some SMD footpritns in PCB. Regards, Tibor Palinkas _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user