On May 24, 2011, at 2:34 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> but I avoid name conflicts in project libraries. > > If we find ourselves gaining popularity and a plethora of libraries > comes into being, we may no longer have the luxury of avoiding name > conflict. "name scoping" came up a few times in the library > discussion, I think keeping the issue in mind, even at time, is > important.
I agree. I was objecting to the notion that we should kill an existing function that works well in simple cases just because it could have problems in more complex cases. gEDA has a huge "dynamic range" in application scale, so there are going to be things that work well in some contexts but not in others. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user